Manage health and social care practice Essay

consequent ground practice refers to the existent impacts, cause and or end dress outtlements of table services / interventions on an individuals life. Its effectiveness is non measured by numbers/figures or financial strategies it is measured by the absolute payoff that is achieved. It isnt near what is require to be done further what is truly achieved as the result that matters. Outcome base practice is centred on results for people in the succeeding(a) beas gains in health, mobility and skills, prevention of deterioration, increases in confidence, engagement and feeling they be in control and fin ein truth last(predicate)y changes in behaviour. It is assessed and intend starting with the end result / last and then planning how the goal is to be achieved. Outcome based practice is approximately investing quite an than funding or purchasing and leads to a very distinguishable kind of relationship with programme or service appropriaters.It means that provid ers piss liberty and are expected to innovate the objectives and plans etcetera It doesnt just require the foreplay of one or two people, all in all(a) team members are set and are required to contribute to the achievement of outcomes. every last(predicate) outcomes will be measured as part of service/programme valuation. at that place are dissimilar slipway to accession outcome based practice following different models or systems and mannequins, including Outcomes into Practice initiated by the Social Policy Research whole (SPRU) in the University of York, a Results Based obligation model, the logical system Model and Outcomes counsel. Outcomes into Practice (SPRU) is very much service oriented and is principally used for adults and older peoples services, for carers and people with learn disabilities.It is user-centred and promotes value of users find their own outcomes. It provides autonomy and flexibility for service providers ensuring that they are responding to the ever changing inescapably and preference of their service users. This model / framework identifies iii categories of outcomes bidding, change and maintenance. It has both official and negative features and is very useful for all involved are revolve abouting on achieving the same identified outcomes, involving service users in decisions about their own care and ensuring that they have control, finding out what works for all involved, enabling staff to use their hatchway and feel valued.some(a) of the disadvantages to this impact embroil the actual measuring of outcomes and although bite-sized outcomes contribute to to a greater extent strategic goals the higher outcomes are concentrated to plan and be effective. Results-Based Accountability this is exceedingly tumesce worked out system and adopts an ends (results) to means approach. It in like manner presents itself as simple and substantially implemented with a talk to exploit rule. This system is able to discriminate surrounded by Population Accountability and act Accountability. Performance accountability is based on three key questions How much did we do? How well did we do it? And is anyone better off as a result?. It requires a adopt for baseline assessments / predictions in order to reminder and evaluate.The advantages to this process accepts it being adaptable to different services and interventions, it provides very strategic outcomes and in the UK is being used for Every nestling Matters outcomes and actually measuring outcomes is more(prenominal) achievable. Some of the disadvantages to this rule acting complicate funding issues, charge relationships as organisations appear to be quite an insular when implementing outcomes, individual outcomes/person-centred working and although the actual supposition is simple the detail is complex.Logic model adopts a visual rendering of interventions and or programmes. It provides a way of apprehension the connections betwe en resources (inputs), activities, intended outcomes and the impact of outcomes. This method allows for short term, medium term and prospicient term impact of outcomes to be aforethought(ip) and monitored, a bit like a road map towards the outcome required. Although this method is not very precise but it does portray a picture to stakeholders about the aspects they think are important. Advantages to this process include it helps systemise and organise a programme, it provides a useful primary planning mother fucker, it illustrates the concept and strategy of programme for stakeholders and other organisations, evaluation of outcomes is fairly easy and straightforward and it git be easily augmented to gibe differing situations.Disadvantages to this process include planning and steering of ongoing interventions and service provision. Outcome Management assumes a results matter style and this provides the hotheaded force behind it. This means that goals necessitate to be quantifi ed on the outset as what gets measured gets done. This method also provides a performance measuring tool and milestones provide opportunities to take stock and puzzle adjustment. This process challenges conventional thinking and provide the opportunity for job descriptions to provide a pathway to enthusiasm and energy rather than just being about compliance. This method takes on an evaluation is important, but learning is even more important observatory and believes that the way forward is to invest in order to get results.Advantages to this process include it is very supportive of innovation, challenges conventional ways of doing things making people think remote of the box and is used a mint in substance abuse programmes where results are easy to measure. Disadvantages to this measure include more complex outcomes are more vexed to plan, assess and monitor and individual focus can be lost. Outcome based practice is proving to a very valued and evidence based practice whic h suggests that supreme outcomes are more likely to be achieved when this process is followed. Legislation and frameworks also advertize the process as a outmatch practice method and evidence strongly backs this up. No matter how small or big a goal it, when able using the outcome based process the individual and their care team are all away of the end result which they want to achieve there for the outcome is much more likely to be achieved than if for an example 1 person has set a goal without following this process and involving the individual and key people in their lives.Read more Manage health and social care practice to stop up positive outcomes for individuals